Maloney on 2+1
We had Alex Maloney visiting us this week, and he gave a lovely talk about his forthcoming paper with Edward Witten on 2+1 gravity with negative cosmological constant.
You’ll recall that Witten’s proposal is that the dual CFT has a partition function of the form
where the central charge , with the radius of AdS3. is the partition function of the famous Monster Module. For higher , the first primary state above the ground state () has . One can systematically write down the , but it is not known whether they, in fact, correspond to bona fide CFTs. Indeed, Gaberdiel had presented a strong (though not air-tight) argument that they cannot, for sufficiently large ().
If Gaberdiel is correct, then, either the proposal (1) is wrong, or there is no semiclassical regime for 2+1 gravity1. In either case you can stop reading this post. If not, then an interesting question arises. Semiclassically, we expect there to be a Hawking-Page transition between hot AdS space (with inverse temperature ) and the AdS BTZ blackhole. Indeed, as a function of complex , you expect a complicated phase structure, given by the fundamental domains for the action of .
When we Wick rotate to Euclidean time, the boundary is a torus, , of modular parameter, . Semiclassically, we expect a single bulk geometry2 to dominate: a handlebody (a solid torus), , whose boundary is . This involves a choice of cycle, , with coprime, such that is contractible in . The usual Hawking-Page transition is the flip between when spatial circle is contractible (hot AdS) and when the Euclidean time-circle is contractible (the blackhole). But, in 2+1 dimensions, the phase structure is much richer.
One thing that might puzzle you, in this regard, is how there can be a phase transition, in light of (1), where the are manifestly analytic. The answer is that have zeroes along the phase boundaries and, in the large- limit, these zeroes become dense, leading to the desired non-analytic behaviour.
In a phrase: Hawking-Page is Lee-Yang!
1 There are other troubling aspects to (1). As I emphasized in my previous post, there are states of the CFT, which are the ground state on the right, and some primary state (with ) on the left. These correspond to super-rotating BTZ blackholes, which have naked singularities, closed timelike curves, and generally look kinda sick in the semiclassical regime (, with fixed).
2 A slight (but only slight) complication is that they must use complex saddle points of the Euclidean action.
Re: Maloney on 2+1
But what is the new idea here ?
Also in the dual of the usual SUSY AdS_3xS^3xT^4 gravity there is a 2d CFT which should capture the intricate phase structure (maybe the mechanism is the same). It is again roughly classified by SL(2,Z) (actually one should mod out by actions of T from the left).