WZW as Transition 1-Gerbe of Chern-Simons 2-Gerbe
Posted by Urs Schreiber
As a kind of comment to M. Hopkins’ lecture on Chern-Simons theory (I, II, III) I want to describe how the Wess-Zumino-Witten 1-gerbe arises as the transition 1-gerbe of the Chern-Simons 2-gerbe (analogous to how a 1-gerbe itself has transition 0-gerbes, i.e. transition bundles).
I’ll advertise a point of view # where we consider the Chern-Simons 2-gerbe as a 3-bundle with structure 3-group
and use the fact that the 2-group
is #, as a groupoid with monoidal structure, nothing but the tautological bundle gerbe representation of the canonical “WZW” gerbe at level on .
Chern-Simons 2-Gerbe and its Structure 3-Group
Let be a -dimensional manifold. (Later we want , but at the moment can be arbitrary.)
Let be a principal -bundle on , for a compact, simple and simply connection Lie group. (For the time being I consider everything without connection.)
Let be a good covering by open contractible sets of and let be the corresponding Lie groupoid.
Then, up to isomorphism, the bundle is a strict functor
Now consider this same functor as a pseudofunctor to the discrete 3-group on : This amounts to regarding the principal (1-)bundle as a degenerate case of a principal 3-bundle.
Denote by the group of piecewise smooth parameterized paths in , based at the neutral element.
Denote by the group of piecewise smooth parameterized loops in , based at the neutral element.
There is an obvious action of on by conjugation, and an obvious homomorphism from loops to paths, which makes a crossed module of groups, hence a strict 2-group.
By smoothly sending elements to chosen based paths in ending at , we can always lift the functor to a functor Notice that there is a unique element in going between elements of with coinciding endpoint. This makes the lift from to always possible.
So this still describes, up to isomorphism, a -bundle on .
But the action of on lifts to an action on the level central extention .
Therefore we may want to further lift to a pseudofunctor
This lift, however, is obstructed by the Pontryagin class in . If this does not vanish, we instead get a pseudofunctor determined by that class in .
The 3-group may be thought of as the largest strict 3-group inside the automorphism 3-group (following the calculation here).
This pseudofunctor is (the local data for) a -Chern-Simons 2-gerbe on .
Notice that the 2-fold pseudoness of this functor means that it assigns elements of to points in double intersections, such that the product in is respected up to an element of on triple intersections, which form a tetrahedron on quandruple intersections that is filled by an element of , such that all these -elements make a 4-simplex commute on quintuple intersections.
Because if we did equip this with a connection, its curvature 4-form would have to be the deRham representative of the Pontryagin class, hence locally be the Chern-Simons 3-form of the connection on . (Compare for instance section 6 of Danny Stevenson’s notes here).
Transition1-Gerbes for the CS 2-Gerbe.
We can compute the nature of transition 1-gerbes for along the lines of the computation of transition bundles for nonabelian gerbes given in section 3.2 of this text.
In order to do so, we choose another good covering of by open contractible sets. Pulled back to each open set in , the functor may be completely trivialized along
This way we obtain on each patch a transition tetrahedron all of whose labels are trivial. On double intersections , these transition tetrahedra are now related by cylinders with triangular base, expressing a morphism between two trivial pseudofunctors with values in .
Think of two trivial transition tetrahedra, a large and a small one, concentrically sitting inside each other. From each vertex of the small tetrahedron draw a line to the corresponding vertex of the large one. This partitions the volume in between the two tetrahedra by those triangular cylinders.
I’ll indicate a triangular cylinder by cutting its sides open like this (Here the bottom and top triangle of the cyclinder are suppressed, since in the present context they are labeled by identity morphisms only.)
Since this is supposed to define a pseudonatural transformation of 3-functors (compare page 6 of these notes):
- the labels on 1-morphisms , , indicate functions from into ,
- the labels on 2-morphisms , and represent functions to ,
- and .
By construction, the will make a tretrahedron commute (meaning that they do consistently interpolate between the small and the large trivial tetrahedron mentioned before).
Now we need a simple but important
Fact. The tautological bundle gerbe at level on may, like any bundle gerbe, be regarded as a groupoid. The 2-group may also be regarded as a groupoid. And as groupoids, these are the same:
This is manifest from the very construction of both these groupoids.
The construction of the tautological bundle gerbe is described for instance in Michael Murray’s original article. The surjective submersion is nothing but , with projection being the end point evaluation. The line bundle over is constructed in the same way as the central extension of , by using the integral 3-form representing the class of the gerbe in deRham cohomology.
Given this identification of the 2-group with the tautological bundle gerbe over , we find that the maps involved in the above triangular cylinder are nothing but
- a map
- a choice of sections of the pulled back bundle gerbe from to .
- a labeling of triangular cylinders by the resulting abelian 3-cocycle.
In other words, we find
Consequence: The transition 1-gerbes of a Chern-Simons 2-gerbe (on at level ) are the pullback of the canonical 1-gerbe on (at that level) to , along a given map .
A different perspective on the relation between Chern-Simons 2-gerbes and WZW 1-gerbes can be found in
Alan L. Carey, Stuart Johnson, Michael K. Murray, Danny Stevenson, Bai-Ling Wang
Bundle gerbes for Chern-Simons and Wess-Zumino-Witten theories
math/0410013.
My discussion here emphasizes the 3-group relevant for Chern-Simons 2-gerbes, and the role played by the String 2-group.
Finally, lect be a 3-manifold with boundary. Then the class in controlling the above construction of the Chern-Simons 2-gerbe necessarily vanishes, and hence may be trivialized globally, on all of .
Moreover, we would choose trivializations of restricted to the boundary, following a general logic # of how to choose sections of -bundles representing states of -particles coupled to them.
Therefore in this case, there are no transition 1-gerbes in the bulk of , but precisely one on its boundary. As we have seen, this data on the boundary is precisely a map of the boundary into , together with a pullback of the canonical gerbe on to . This way the Wess-Zumino-Witten term arises on the boundary of Chern-Simons theory.
Re: WZW as Transition 1-Gerbe of Chern-Simons 2-Gerbe
You write:
do you havew a general theory
an -gerbe is an -bundle?
at least for and ?
or with side conditions?