2+1 D Yang-Mills at Large-N
A while back, I pointed to an announcement by Leigh, Minic and Yelnikov, proposing a solution to 2+1 D Yang-Mills at large-. Well, the long version of their paper has appeared.
The main previously-missing detail which is filled in here (perhaps making sense of my previous discussion) is how exactly they propose to regularize the Karabali-Nair Hamiltonian (see Appendix A of their paper) where Here and is the ordinary Green’s function, satisfying .
They take as an ansatz that the ground state wave functional takes the form where and , for some kernel . Formally, they then expand and find that the Schrœdinger equation, is equivalent to a Riccati equation, which is solved1 by a ratio of Bessel functions. (There’s a constant of integration that is fixed by demanding that be normalizable. This choice also, as they argue, yields the correct asymptotically-free UV behaviour and IR behaviour corresponding to confinement and a mass-gap.)
In addition to the predictions for the spectrum of spin- glueballs that I discussed previously, they also produce predictions for the spectrum of higher-spin glueball states.
1 The trick is to write with , which converts the (nonlinear) Riccati equation into the (linear) Bessel equation,
Re: 2+1 D Yang-Mills at Large-N
Its certainly an interesting paper. There are certain parts that get a little hazy to me, for instance, its not clear to me why they restrict to quadratic order in solving the Schroedinger eqn (presumably b/c they want to restrict themselves to dealing with simple local ‘probing’ operators like tr(dbar j dbar j).
They feel this is morally equivalent to some sort of expansion alla string theory, where higher order terms end up probing spatial extent. But, I don’t quite see why that has to be the case, and you might worry that theres a lot of physics in there thats getting chopped off.
Still the numbers are eerily close to lattice results