Random Permutations (Part 13)
Posted by John Baez
Last time I started talking about the groupoid of ‘finite sets equipped with permutation’, . Remember:
- an object of is a finite set with a bijection ;
- a morphism is a bijection such that .
In other words, is the groupoid of finite -sets. It’s also equivalent to the groupoid of covering spaces of the circle having finitely many sheets!
Today I’d like to talk about another slightly bigger groupoid. It’s very pretty, and I think it will shed light on a puzzle we saw earlier: the mysterious connection between random permutations and Poisson distributions.
I’ll conclude with a question for homotopy theorists.
Remember the formula I proved last time:
where is the set of Young diagrams, is the number of columns of length in the Young diagram , is the one-object groupoid corresponding to the group , and for any category I’m using
to stand for the ‘weak quotient’ of by the permutation group . (That is, instead of just modding out, we throw in isomorphisms coming from permutations. I explained this in more detail last time.)
Now, in math we often see expressions like
and for any category ,
is the free symmetric monoidal category on . The formula for looks vaguely similar! Indeed, the free symmetric monoidal category on is
and this seems to be lurking in the background in a strangely fractured way here:
What’s going on?
What’s going on is that , the set of Young diagrams, is really the set of functions that vanish except at finitely many points. Suppose we drop that finiteness condition! Then things get nicer.
Remember, in any situation where products distribute over sums, if we have a bunch of things indexed by , we can write the distributive law as
For example, if we multiply 5 sums of 2 things we get a sum of products of 2 things. So, if we take
and drop the finiteness condition on , we get a new groupoid, which I’ll call :
and we can rewrite this using the distributive law:
It’s just the product of the free symmetric monoidal categories on all the .
What is the category actually like? It’s a groupoid. It has objects and so on. There are no morphisms between distinct objects. The automorphism group of is the semidirect product of and , where the symmetric group acts to permute the factors.
So, in words, is the ‘free symmetric monoidal category on an object having as its symmetry group’.
This sounds abstract. But it’s equivalent to something concrete: the groupoid of finite sets that are equipped with a permutation all of whose cycles have length . The object corresponds to a set with a permutation having a single cycle of length . The tensor product corresponds to disjoint union. Thus, corresponds to a set with a permutation having disjoint cycles of length .
So, you can think of an object of
as an infinite list of finite sets, one for each , where the th set is equipped with a permutation having only cycles of length .
Taking the disjoint union of all these sets, we get a single set with a permutation on it. This set may be infinite, but all its cycles have finite length, and it has finitely many cycles of each length . So:
Theorem. The groupoid is equivalent to the groupoid of sets equipped with a permutation having only cycles of finite length, with finitely many cycles of each length.
It’s easy from this description to see the inclusion
It’s just the inclusion of the finite sets equipped with permutation!
I claim that the groupoid explains why the number of cycles of length in a randomly chosen permutation of an -element set approaches a Poisson-distributed random variable with mean as . The fact that it’s a product also explains why these random variables become independent in the limit.
I’ll talk about this more later. But to get an idea of how it works, let’s compute the groupoid cardinality of . It’s
The Poisson distribution with mean is
so we’re seeing that lurking here. But I need to think about this more before I can give a really convincing explanation.
Let me conclude with a puzzle for homotopy theorists.
First, some background so others can enjoy the puzzle, or at least learn something. Homotopy theorists know how to take any category and turn it into a topological space: the geometric realization of its nerve. If we take a group and apply this trick to the one-object groupoid we get the Eilenberg–Mac Lane space . This is the connected space with as its fundamental group and all higher homotopy groups being trivial. As long as we give the discrete topology, as we’ll do for here, is also the classifying space for -bundles, denoted . (This looks a lot like the groupoid — but that’s okay, because in homotopy theory a groupoid is considered only slightly different from the geometric realization of its nerve.)
Puzzle. Given a discrete group , what’s a nice description of the geometric realization of the nerve of , the free symmetric monoidal category on the one-object groupoid corresponding to ? I’m especially interested in the case where is a finite cyclic group.
By the way, the classifying space is a ‘lens space’: it’s formed by taking the unit sphere in and quotienting by the action of the th roots of unity. My first guess on the puzzle is to take the disjoint union
A point in here is a finite set of points in the lens space! Note that the construction here is different from the infinite symmetric product used in the Dold–Kan theorem, because we are not identifying an -element set of points with an -element set whose extra element is the basepoint.
What do you think, experts?
Re: Random Permutations (Part 13)
I think the formula after “we can write the distributive law” has the sums and products the wrong way round?