July 15, 2022
HL ≠ HS
There’s a nice new paper by Kang et al, who point out something about class-S theories that should be well-known, but isn’t.
In the (untwisted) theories of class-S, the Hall-Littlewood index, at genus-0, coincides with the Hilbert Series of the Higgs branch. The Hilbert series counts the operators that parametrize the Higgs branch (each contributes to the index). The Hall-Littlewood index also includes contributions from operators (which contribute to the index). But, for the untwisted theories of class-S, there is a folk-theorem that there are no operators at genus-0, and so the Hilbert series and Hall-Littlewood index agree.
For genus , the gauge symmetry1 cannot be completely Higgsed on the Higgs branch of the theory. For the theory of type , there’s a unbroken at a generic point on the Higgs branch2. Correspondingly, the SCFT contains multiplets which, when you move out onto the Higgs branch and flow to the IR, flow to the multiplets3 of the free theory.
What Kang et al point out is that the same is true at genus-0, when you include enough -twisted punctures. They do this by explicitly calculating the Hall-Littlewood index in a series of examples.
But it’s nice to have a class of examples where that hard work is unnecessary.