Skip to the Main Content

Note:These pages make extensive use of the latest XHTML and CSS Standards. They ought to look great in any standards-compliant modern browser. Unfortunately, they will probably look horrible in older browsers, like Netscape 4.x and IE 4.x. Moreover, many posts use MathML, which is, currently only supported in Mozilla. My best suggestion (and you will thank me when surfing an ever-increasing number of sites on the web which have been crafted to use the new standards) is to upgrade to the latest version of your browser. If that's not possible, consider moving to the Standards-compliant and open-source Mozilla browser.

March 7, 2025

Visual Insights

Posted by John Baez

I’m giving a talk next Friday, March 14th, at 9 am Pacific Daylight time here in California. You’re all invited!

(Note that Daylight Savings Time starts March 9th, so do your calculations carefully if you do them before then.)

Title: Visual Insights

Abstract: For several years I ran a blog called Visual Insight, which was a place to share striking images that help explain topics in mathematics.  In this talk I’d like to show you some of those images and explain some of the mathematics they illustrate.

Zoom link: https://virginia.zoom.us/j/97786599157?pwd=jr0dvbolVZ6zrHZhjOSeE2aFvbl6Ix.1

Recording: This talk will be recorded, and eventually a video will appear here: https://www.youtube.com/@IllustratingMathSeminar

Continue reading “Visual Insights” …
Posted at 6:31 AM UTC | Permalink | Post a Comment

March 4, 2025

How Good are Permutation Represesentations?

Posted by John Baez

Any action of a finite group GG on a finite set XX gives a linear representation of GG on the vector space with basis XX. This is called a ‘permutation representation’. And this raises a natural question: how many representations of finite groups are permutation representations?

Most representations are not permutation representations, since every permutation representation has a vector fixed by all elements of GG, namely the vector that’s the sum of all elements of XX. In other words, every permutation representation has a 1-dimensional trivial rep sitting inside it.

But what if we could ‘subtract off’ this trivial representation?

There are different levels of subtlety with which we can do this. For example, we can decategorify, and let:

  • the Burnside ring of GG be the ring A(G)A(G) of formal differences of isomorphism classes of actions of GG on finite sets;

  • the representation ring of GG be the ring R(G)R(G) of formal differences of isomorphism classes of finite-dimensional representations of GG.

In either of these rings, we can subtract.

There’s an obvious map β:A(G)→R(G)\beta : A(G) \to R(G) , since any action of GG on a finite set gives a permutation representation of GG on the vector space with basis XX.

So I asked on MathOverflow: is β\beta typically surjective, or typically not surjective?

Continue reading “How Good are Permutation Represesentations?” …
Posted at 5:01 PM UTC | Permalink | Followups (9)